In 2019, SoFi Technologies signed a 20-year, $625 million naming rights agreement with the Los Angeles Stadium and Entertainment District — the venue that became SoFi Stadium, home of the Rams and the Chargers. In 2021, Crypto.com signed a 20-year, $700 million agreement for the arena that became Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles. In 2017, Allegiant Travel Company signed a 30-year deal worth approximately $750 million for the stadium that became Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas.

Stadium naming rights are among the most structured long-term contract assets in sports finance. They are fixed-term, contracted revenue streams backed by creditworthy corporate counterparties, secured against identifiable physical assets with guaranteed public exposure. They have characteristics that should make them attractive for securitization — and not one of them has been tokenized.

What a Naming Rights Contract Actually Is

A naming rights agreement is a licensing contract between a sports venue (or its owner) and a corporate sponsor. The sponsor pays for the right to have their name attached to the venue for a defined term. The payment is typically structured as annual installments — $31.25 million per year for SoFi, approximately $35 million per year for Crypto.com Arena. The contract defines the sponsor's rights: name display, signage placement, activation opportunities, hospitality access, and termination conditions.

The asset from the venue owner's perspective is a long-term contracted receivable — a series of future cash flows due from a creditworthy corporate counterparty. SoFi Technologies' annual naming rights payment is as predictable as a corporate bond coupon, backed by a publicly traded company with ongoing obligations. It has a duration (20 years), a coupon (the annual payment), and a credit quality (tied to the sponsor's financial health).

This is the profile of a securitizable asset. Mortgage receivables, auto loan payments, and credit card receivables are all securitized because they have the same basic structure: predictable cash flows from identifiable counterparties, packaged and sold to investors who want the income stream without holding the underlying relationship. Naming rights have never been securitized or tokenized at scale — not because the asset is unsuitable, but because the market has not built the infrastructure.

The Complications

Three features of naming rights contracts make securitization more complex than standard receivables.

Termination risk. Naming rights contracts typically include termination clauses triggered by the sponsor's bankruptcy, significant reputational events, or mutual agreement. FTX Arena in Miami rebranded back to Kaseya Center in 2023 after FTX's collapse — within months of signing what was intended to be a 19-year, $135 million deal. Enron Field became Minute Maid Park after Enron's 2001 bankruptcy. The termination risk requires either credit enhancement (a financial guarantee that the annual payments will be made regardless of the sponsor's status) or structural protections that pass through replacement naming rights revenue if the original sponsor exits.

Non-transferability. Most naming rights contracts include consent requirements for assignment — the venue cannot sell the receivable to a third party without the sponsor's approval. Tokenizing the cash flow stream would require either restructuring the contract to allow assignment or creating a derivative structure that references the contract's payments without technically assigning the contract itself.

The reputational dimension. A naming rights deal carries intangible value for the sponsor beyond the financial payment — brand association with a major venue, marketing activation opportunities, and hospitality access. These elements cannot be tokenized. Fractional investors in a tokenized naming rights stream receive only the financial payments, not the marketing relationship. This bifurcates the asset in a way that complicates valuation.

What a Tokenized Naming Right Would Look Like

The most plausible structure is a special purpose vehicle (SPV) that holds the naming rights contract (with assignment consent from the sponsor), issues tokenized notes representing fractional interests in the contracted payment stream, and distributes annual payments to token holders after fees. The SPV structure is the same architecture used for tokenized private credit and tokenized real estate — the naming rights contract is the collateral, the token holders are the lenders.

The first tokenized naming rights deal will probably come from a newer, smaller venue rather than a marquee stadium — the contract complexity and legal costs of restructuring a SoFi-scale deal are prohibitive at current market scale. A $10-30 million naming rights deal for a regional arena or sports facility, with a creditworthy sponsor and a more flexible contract structure, is the more likely first mover. From there, the template scales upward.

→ Creator economy — another entertainment asset being tokenized
→ Music royalties — the sports world's closest analog
→ How to evaluate an RWA project — the due diligence framework